downloads | documentation | faq | getting help | mailing lists | licenses | wiki | reporting bugs | php.net sites | links | conferences | my php.net

search for in the

ftok> <SDO_DAS_Relational::executeQuery
[edit] Last updated: Mon, 01 Nov 2010

view this page in

CXXXIX. セマフォ・共有メモリおよび IPC 関数(semaphore)

導入

このモジュールは、System V IPC 関連の関数へのラッパーを提供します。 セマフォ・共有メモリおよびプロセス間通信(IPC)がその中に含まれます。

セマフォは、マシーン上のリソースへの排他的アクセス機能や、 同時にあるリソースを使用することができるプロセスの数を制限するために 使用することができます。

このモジュールは、System V 共有メモリを使用した共有メモリ関数も 提供します。共有メモリは、グローバル変数へのアクセス手段を提供するために 使用することが可能です。別の httpd デーモンおよび (Perl, C, ... のような)他のプログラムさえ、グローバルデータ交換を 提供するこのデータにアクセスすることが可能です。 共有メモリは、同時アクセスに関して安全ではないということを覚えておいて ください。 同期をとるには、セマフォを使用してください。

表 1. Unix OS による共有メモリの制限

SHMMAX共有メモリの最大サイズ。通常は 131072 バイト
SHMMIN共有メモリの最小サイズ。通常は 1 バイト
SHMMNI共有メモリセグメントの最大数。通常は 100
SHMSEGプロセス毎の共有メモリの最大数。通常は 6

メッセージング関数は、他のプロセスと相互にメッセージを送受信する ために使用することができます。 これにより簡単で効率的なプロセス間のデータ交換が可能であり、 Unix ドメインソケットを用いる場合のような設定は不要です。

注意: この拡張モジュールは Windows 環境では利用できません。

要件

外部ライブラリを必要としません。

インストール手順

この関数はデフォルトでは有効になってはいません。System V セマフォの サポートを有効にするには、オプション --enable-sysvsem を指定して PHP を コンパイルする必要があります。System V 共有メモリのサポートを有効にするには、 オプション --enable-sysvshm を 指定して PHP をコンパイルする必要があります。System V メッセージを有効に するには、オプション --enable-sysvmsg を指定して PHP をコンパイル します。

実行時設定

php.ini の設定により動作が変化します。

表 2. セマフォ設定オプション

名前デフォルト変更の可否変更履歴
sysvmsg.value"42"PHP_INI_ALL 
sysvmsg.string"foobar"PHP_INI_ALL 
PHP_INI_* 定数の詳細および定義については 付録G を参照してください。

定義済み定数

以下の定数が定義されています。 この関数の拡張モジュールが PHP 組み込みでコンパイルされているか、 実行時に動的にロードされている場合のみ使用可能です。

表 3. System V メッセージ定数

定数
MSG_IPC_NOWAITinteger
MSG_NOERRORinteger
MSG_EXCEPTinteger

目次
ftok --  パス名とプロジェクト ID を、System V IPC キーに変換する
msg_get_queue --  メッセージキューを作成またはそれにアタッチする
msg_receive --  メッセージキューからメッセージを受信する
msg_remove_queue --  メッセージキューを破棄する
msg_send --  メッセージキューにメッセージを送信する
msg_set_queue --  メッセージキューデータ構造体の情報を設定する
msg_stat_queue --  メッセージキューデータ構造体の情報を返す
sem_acquire -- セマフォを得る
sem_get -- セマフォ ID を得る
sem_release -- セマフォを解放する
sem_remove -- セマフォを削除する
shm_attach -- 共有メモリセグメントを作成またはオープンする
shm_detach -- 共有メモリセグメントへの接続を閉じる
shm_get_var -- 共有メモリから変数を返す
shm_put_var -- 共有メモリの変数を挿入または更新する
shm_remove_var -- 共有メモリから変数を削除する
shm_remove -- Unix システムから共有メモリを削除する


ftok> <SDO_DAS_Relational::executeQuery
[edit] Last updated: Mon, 01 Nov 2010
 
add a note add a note User Contributed Notes セマフォ・共有メモリおよび IPC 関数(semaphore)
piosaw79 25-Jul-2011 02:36
I'm using this simple functions to mimic semaphores on Windows (with $max_acquire = 1):

<?php
if ( !function_exists('sem_get') ) {
    function
sem_get($key) { return fopen(__FILE__.'.sem.'.$key, 'w+'); }
    function
sem_acquire($sem_id) { return flock($sem_id, LOCK_EX); }
    function
sem_release($sem_id) { return flock($sem_id, LOCK_UN); }
}
?>
alexh at southwestmicrowave dot com 19-Feb-2008 09:24
I've had a devil of a time interfacing with non-PHP declared shared memory.  DO NOT do this unless you read the php-X.X.X/ext/sysvshm/ code directly.  Non-PHP programs need to use exactly the same "shared memory" struct as PHP uses, otherwise this "system V standard" call doesn't work.

Here are the specific deviations from the System-V C-calls:

<?
$shmkey
= ftok($shmkey_path, $shmkey_proj_id);
?>

In C the $shmkey_proj_id is an int, but in PHP it's a char* to a single char.  This means that your C program is restricted to using 0-255 (in PHP chr(0) through chr(255)) for project ID's, if it used anything else then you have to re-write your C-routine.

<?
$var
= shm_get_var($shm_id, 0);
$fail = shm_put_var($shm_id, 0, $var1 )
?>

There are no such things as a system V calls like this at all.  In system V you simply have a pointer to the beginning of your shared memory segment after attaching, so as long as you offset to the right spot you get what you want.  In PHP, shared memory is ONLY cast as a struct, and the "data" is serialized as a string in the "mem" portion of the struct:

<? //C code
typedef struct {
       
long key;
       
long length;
       
long next;
       
char mem;
}
sysvshm_chunk;
?>

If your C program didn't use this struct you need to re-write it to use this struct and write everything as a string. 

This is rather absurd, as the purpose of shared memory is to communicate quickly with other programs resident in memory.  But it is what it is.
mr dot smaon at gmail dot com 25-Jan-2007 09:08
Here is a simple Mutex class implementation, using semaphore on Linux and flock on windows.
Filename is optionnal, but you can provide it anyway. This way the file will be created on windows, not on linux as it is not needed.
It's fast written and certainly lacks error checking code.

<?php

   
class Mutex
   
{
        private
$id;
        private
$sem_id;
        private
$is_acquired = false;
        private
$is_windows = false;
        private
$filename = '';
        private
$filepointer;

        function
__construct()
        {
            if(
substr(PHP_OS, 0, 3) == 'WIN')
               
$this->is_windows = true;
        }

        public function
init($id, $filename = '')
        {
           
$this->id = $id;

            if(
$this->is_windows)
            {
                if(empty(
$filename)){
                    print
"no filename specified";
                    return
false;
                }
                else
                   
$this->filename = $filename;
            }
            else
            {
                if(!(
$this->sem_id = sem_get($this->id, 1))){
                    print
"Error getting semaphore";
                    return
false;
                }
            }

            return
true;
        }

        public function
acquire()
        {
            if(
$this->is_windows)
            {
                if((
$this->filepointer = @fopen($this->filename, "w+")) == false)
                {
                    print
"error opening mutex file<br>";
                    return
false;
                }
               
                if(
flock($this->filepointer, LOCK_EX) == false)
                {
                    print
"error locking mutex file<br>";
                    return
false;
                }
            }
            else
            {
                if (!
sem_acquire($this->sem_id)){
                    print
"error acquiring semaphore";
                    return
false;
                }
            }

           
$this->is_acquired = true;
            return
true;
        }

        public function
release()
        {
            if(!
$this->is_acquired)
                return
true;

            if(
$this->is_windows)
            {
                if(
flock($this->filepointer, LOCK_UN) == false)
                {
                    print
"error unlocking mutex file<br>";
                    return
false;
                }

               
fclose($this->filepointer);
            }
            else
            {
                if (!
sem_release($this->sem_id)){
                    print
"error releasing semaphore";
                    return
false;
                }
            }

           
$this->is_acquired = false;
            return
true;
        }

        public function
getId()
        {
            return
$this->sem_id;
        }
    }

?>

Example use:

<?php

    $mutex
= new Mutex();
   
$mutex->init(1, "mutex_file.txt");
   
$mutex->acquire();

   
//Whatever you want single-threaded here...
   
$mutex->release();

?>
hekkwan at gmail dot com 14-Nov-2006 06:15
I have been trying to get a php console script and a C application to use a common semaphore for a while. I just got it working, so I thought Id paste the code here incase anyone needs to do this, however, this is not the place for long code examples

I used c code from the php implementation to set up the semaphore set and then mimic the way the php interpreter implements a mutext type locking scheme, using a common semop call.

One has to do the process in the same way as its done in the php implementation, otherwise you run the risk of the php interpreter resetting the semaphore set for you.

The basic idea is.
1) sem_get - use a three semaphore set
1.1) increment the first sem
1.2) check the usage count (sem 3), if only one, set the max_attach using sem 2 for mutex behaviour to sem 3
2) decrement sem 1
3) for locking / unlocking use the first semaphore, but always call the above from your c-code.

If you want a copy of my code, email me and I'll happily send it to you !
chrissavery at removeme dot gmail dot com 02-Jun-2006 01:18
I was confused by two things that caused strange behaviour in my use of semaphores with php scripts running under apache.

Often enough page requests will end up being filled by the same process as other simultaneous requests. So semaphores will block when you may not have expected.

Also note that sem_remove() will remove it for all processes, not just the calling one. So you have to be sure that the last process running removes the semaphore and none before. I thought there was some failures occurring when my child processes were dropping out with errors.

So you can't just use get, acquire, release, remove in one script that will be hit by a web user. (1) They may end up in the same process and will wait on the other, and (2) the first one to finish will destroy the semaphore for others.

I left out the remove call, and it works ok, but I still wonder if the semaphore is removed by php when the last script that did a get finishes? Also creating a child process to do the work using proc_open works to ensure seperate processes but to be careful you would want to limit the number somehow as well.
Denis Gerasimov 02-Nov-2005 04:19
Many (most?) developers use Win32 platform for PHP Web applications development while production servers mostly run Unix/Linux OS. Below is the stub code I use to make it possible to write scripts on Win32 that use semaphores:

<?php

if (substr(PHP_OS, 0, 3) == 'WIN') {  // if Windows OS detected

   
function ftok($pathname, $proj)
    {
        if (empty(
$pathname) || !file_exists($pathname)) {  // an error occured
           
return -1;
        }
       
       
$pathname = $pathname . (string) $proj;
       
$key = array();
        while (
sizeof($key) < strlen($pathname)) {
           
$key[] = ord(substr($pathname, sizeof($key), 1));
        }
       
        return
dechex(array_sum($key));
    }
   
    function
sem_acquire($sem_identifier)
    {
        return
true;
    }

    function
sem_get($key, $max_acquire = null, $perm = null, $auto_release = null)
    {
        return
true;
    }
   
    function
sem_release($sem_identifier)
    {
        return
true;
    }
   
    function
sem_remove($sem_identifier)
    {
        return
true;
    }
   
}

?>

Of course, there is no way to test semaphores until you have no Unix/Linux test server.
p4nzer at yahoo dot com 01-Nov-2005 05:55
Actually, the way to lock a semaphore from C code appears to be:
<?
    struct sembuf semptr
[2];

    if( (
semid = semget(SEM_KEY, PHP_SEM_NEED_NUMBER, 0666 | IPC_CREAT)) < 0 ) {
       
perror("semget");
        return
1;
    }

   
semptr[0].sem_num = 0;
   
semptr[0].sem_op = -1;
   
semptr[0].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
   
semptr[1].sem_num = 1;
   
semptr[1].sem_op 1;
   
semptr[1].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;

    if(
semop(semid, &semptr[0], 2) < 0 ) {
   
perror("semop");
    }
?>

PS: Disregard the <? and ?>, it's just for pretty printing... this is C code!
hcuevas at galenicom dot com 23-Oct-2003 07:49
Don't use semaphores to serialize access to an undefined number of resources. There is no way (yet) to know before locking if a semaphore is already locked, thus not being able to fully release the semaphore and occupying a semaphore resource for an undefined time.

A possible solution is to build a shared mem pool and store there the current number of locks for a semaphore id.

Cheers,
Horaci Cuevas
Roman Laptev <tmp at laptev dot org> 02-Apr-2003 06:50
If you going to work with semaphore, which was created by some external program, you can try the following code for this program (C example):

#define SVSEM_MODE (SEM_R | SEM_A | SEM_R>>3 | SEM_R>>6) /* 0644 */
#define PHP_SEM_NEED_NUMBER 3

/*.......*/
int semid, semflag = SVSEM_MODE | IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL;
struct sembuf semptr;
union semun semopts;
/*.......*/
if( (semid = semget(sempath, PHP_SEM_NEED_NUMBER, semflag)) >= 0 ) {
  semopts.val = 1; /* initial value for sem */
  if( semctl( semid, 0, SETVAL, semopts) < 0 ) {/*error*/}
  if( semctl( semid, 1, SETVAL, semopts) < 0 ) {/*error*/}
  /* PHP wanna zero for its own semget at third sem.
   * look at ./PHP_SOURCE_PATH/ext/sysvsem/sysvsem.c
   */
  semopts.val = 0;
  if( semctl( semid, 2, SETVAL, semopts) < 0 ) {/*error*/}
}
else if(errno == EEXIST) { /* connect only  */
  if( (semid = semget(sempath, PHP_SEM_NEED_NUMBER, SVSEM_MODE | IPC_CREAT)) < 0 ) {/*error*/}
}
else {/*error*/}

/*.......*/
/* If you want acquire the sem */
  semptr.sem_num = 0;
  semptr.sem_op = -1; /* lock it */
  semptr.sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
  while( semop(semid, &semptr, 1) < 0 ) {/*error*/}
/*.......*/

Thanks,
Roma
elran70 at hotmail dot com 22-Jun-2002 10:54
Samlpe code for using most of the functions here:

    $MEMSIZE    =   512;//  size of shared memory to allocate
    $SEMKEY     =   1;  //  Semaphore key
    $SHMKEY     =   2;  //  Shared memory key

    echo "Start.\n";
    // Get semaphore
    $sem_id = sem_get($SEMKEY, 1);
    if ($sem_id === false)
    {
        echo "Fail to get semaphore";
        exit;
    }
    else
        echo "Got semaphore $sem_id.\n";

    // Accuire semaphore
    if (! sem_acquire($sem_id))
    {
        echo "Fail to aquire semaphore $sem_id.\n";
        sem_remove($sem_id);
        exit;
    }
    else
        echo "Success aquire semaphore $sem_id.\n";

    $shm_id =   shm_attach($SHMKEY, $MEMSIZE);
    if ($shm_id === false)
    {
        echo "Fail to attach shared memory.\n";
        sem_remove($sem_id);
        exit;
    }
    else
        echo "Success to attach shared memory : $shm_id.\n";

    // Write variable 1
    if (!shm_put_var($shm_id, 1, "Variable 1"))
    {
        echo "Fail to put var 1 on shared memory $shm_id.\n";
        sem_remove($sem_id);
        shm_remove ($shm_id);
        exit;
    }
    else
        echo "Write var1 to shared memory.\n";

    // Write variable 2
    if (!shm_put_var($shm_id, 2, "Variable 2"))
    {
        echo "Fail to put var 2 on shared memory $shm_id.\n";
        sem_remove($sem_id);
        shm_remove ($shm_id);
        exit;
    }
    else
        echo "Write var2 to shared memory.\n";

    // Read variable 1
    $var1   =   shm_get_var ($shm_id, 1);
    if ($var1 === false)
    {
        echo "Fail to retrive Var 1 from Shared memory $shm_id, return value=$var1.\n";
    }
    else
        echo "Read var1=$var1.\n";

    // Read variable 1
    $var2   =   shm_get_var ($shm_id, 2);
    if ($var1 === false)
    {
        echo "Fail to retrive Var 2 from Shared memory $shm_id, return value=$var2.\n";
    }
    else
        echo "Read var2=$var2.\n";

    // Release semaphore
    if (!sem_release($sem_id))
        echo "Fail to release $sem_id semaphore.\n";
    else
        echo "Semaphore $sem_id released.\n";

    // remove shared memory segmant from SysV
    if (shm_remove ($shm_id))
        echo "Shared memory successfully removed from SysV.\n";
    else
        echo "Fail to remove $shm_id shared memory from SysV.\n";

    // Remove semaphore
    if (sem_remove($sem_id))
        echo "semaphore removed successfully from SysV.\n";
    else
        echo "Fail to remove $sem_id semaphore from SysV.\n";
    echo "End.\n";
mikew at php dot net 31-May-2001 09:46
As for security,   please look at the perm argument to shm_get.   Shared Memory blocks has the same permission semantics as unix user/group/other file permissions.   As long as your webserver is running as a user that no other users can script to..  and as long as the permissions are set to 600,  you should be fine and have no security concerns.
php at stolt dot de 20-Sep-2000 11:58
The integer keys for sem_get() and shm_attach() have to be systemwide unique. There is no method to ensure that no other process on the system will use your specific key (security! and possible malfunction). Also shared memory is very seldom used there are possibilities for conflicts! To see the used id's you can use the program 'ipcs' (at least under SuseLinux;) ). Thanks Christian C.

 
show source | credits | sitemap | contact | advertising | mirror sites